Search
  • Joe Caraccio

Supreme Court To Hear Hernández v. Mesa

SCOTUS granted cert. 15-118 Hernandez v. Mesa

This case has to do with the US Governments use of deadly force at the Mexican-American border. See below.

15-118 HERNANDEZ V. MESA

DECISION BELOW: 785 F.3d 117

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 12-50217

QUESTION PRESENTED:

In Boumediene v. Bush, this Court held that the Constitution's extraterritorial application

"turn[s] on objective factors and practical concerns," not a "formal sovereignty-based test."

553 U.S. 723, 764 (2008). That holding is consistent with Justice Kennedy's concurrence two

decades earlier in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), rejecting four

Justices' formalist approach to extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment's warrant

requirement.

The questions presented are:

1. Does a formalist or functionalist analysis govern the extraterritorial application of the

Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border

shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States?

2. May qualified immunity be granted or denied based on facts-such as the victim's legal

status

IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED BY THE PETITION, THE PARTIES ARE

DIRECTED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: “WHETHER THE CLAIM

IN THIS CASE MAY BE ASSERTED UNDER

BIVENS v. SIX UNKNOWN FED. NARCOTICS

AGENTS, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).”

CERT. GRANTED 10/11/2016

SCOTUS 4th Amendment Case 2016 Mesa

Recent Posts

See All

Printable rights document where you can list your attorney name and contact number should you ever have an encounter with law enforcement. Lists your rights during such a stop including your right to